[Anatomy of Cracking] [How Crackers Crack] [Legal and Ethical Issues] [Responses to Cracking] [On the Lighter Side] [ Questions for Discussion ] [Bibliography]

Who Are These Crackers, Anyways?

Profile of a Cracker:

Crackers are typically young males in their early teens to late twenties. They are often described as fast learners. A cracker can often be described as "bored" with school and prefers computers over schoolwork. In later life crackers can often find employment in computer-related professions such as designing operating systems (assuming they are not in jain for their criminal activities!).

The profiles of crackers contain several categories:

Disgruntled Employees--one of the most common types of crackers. Many times employees for large corporations access more information than they should or abuse their authority for other and more personal reasons. Extreme cases include employees who use computers to extort and blackmail.

Software developers--competition in the software world is vicious. To stay on top, some individuals have resorted to cracking (electronic industrial espionage and sabotage). Other software developers crack their own systems to test them and improve their ability to withstand outside cracking attempts.

Pranksters--young, adolescent males who think it's fun to break into and look around in the phone company's computer network or other computer systems. Most crackers start off as pranksters before pursuing more infamous cracking careers. (Predominant--most crackers are in it for the intellectual challenge, not to make money or cause harm).

Professionals--crackers who work for money. These computer mercenaries (link to thief motivation) are good at what they do and seldom get caught.

Terrorists--conceivably, the electronic highways make ideal targets for terrorists. Increased societal dependence on computers just makes them all the more attractive. So far no crackers have yet to be classified as digital terrorists. Terrorists may also use viruses, worms, or physical destruction of networks to achieve their ends.

Motives/Psychology Of A Cracker

There are many motivations for people to become crackers. Some computer enthusiasts and crackers lead a certain lifestyle that may predispose them to cracking. Crackers may often be socially inadequate, but are otherwise intellectually capable people and are often self-taught computer programmers. Crackers are predominately adolescent males (ages ranging from the teens to the twenties); teen angst and boredom are therefore powerful influences on cracking.

Other powerful motivations include being able to excercise computer prowess, finding better ways to protect systems, revenge/vandalism, electronic voyeurism, and an ideology of "information socialism", where information is viewed as a public good which should not to be "hoarded" by anyone.

Bill Landreth ,aka "The Cracker", lists several motives and profiles for and of crackers. Most crackers are in it for the intellectual challenge-- cracking is often a game of wits where crackers must carefully cover their tracks on user logs to avoid detection. Cracking a system presents a great challenge with equally great risks, because detection may ulitmately leads to arrest.

Landreth describes five categories of crackers, each with a different motivation: the Novice, the Student, the Tourist, the Crasher, and the Thief:

Novice:

Comparable to internet "newbies". These entry-level crackers (usually ages 12 to 14) live off discarded or unused accounts of former employees or older crackers. They often perceive hacking as fun and mischievious: to them it is mostly play. The novice crakcer gets bored quickly, logging off to play video games or do homework. Novice crackers often make mistakes and are easily drawn out of hiding by stern system operators or other programmers.

Student:

These crackers follow in the tradition of 1970's MIT students. They share a great passion for computers and computer programming. Their interest in unauthorized computer access is usually rather benign, and they often form social networks to crack and study systems. Students usually respect the programmers of the systems they crack, and feed off the intellectual challenge of learning about their targeted system. Students usually want to remain undetected in a system and if possible will leave no sign of their passing within the system. They try to find out as much information as possible about the systems they crack. Later in life, they often find employment as system operators.

Tourist:

Tourists are another type of mostly benign cracker. They often feel the need to test themselves. Strong mathematical probability skills and backgrounds may allow them to crack almost any system. When they do crack a system and find nothing that is immediately interesting, they tend to log off. (They don't obsess over systems like students do). This type of cracker may not respect systems as much as the student crackers. To tourists, systems are meant to be broken into, not studied--their involvement with a system ends after they break in. Tourists can be malignant when they pass information on how to crack a particular system on to crashers and thieves.

Crasher:

Crashers give all hackers a bad name. They seem to operate with little or no logical purpose other than stroking their egos and satisfying their need to boast by bringing systems to a crashing halt. They usually have one main goal: to make themselves known to their victims and peers. Crashers often adopt "tagging names". (ie the Crasher, Phiber Optik, or Dark Dante). The tag names allow everyone to know who was responsible for the damage they caused while simultaneously keeping their real identities a secret.

Theif:

This cracker is a true criminal. To get access to systems, thieves may resort to blackmail or bribery to get the information needed to breakk into computer systems. Theives usually profit off their cracking activities. Theives are often involved with electronic espionage and sabotage. They are also the most professional of all crackers--they do real research before hitting a computer system rather than relying on the stumbling "trial and error" approaches of the other cracker types. Their targets are intentional, not accidental. Theives are also the rarest type of cracker and the hardest to apprehend (only an estimated 5 to 10 percent are ever caught, because they are so good at what they do and at covering their tracks).

Crackers In The Public's Eye:

(in no particular order)

Kevin Mitnick:

Kevin Mitnick is the epitome of all crackers. Kevin's personal and social problems found a digital outlet at an early age. His first run-ins with the law start at age 16 when a judge put him on probation for stealing a Pacific Bell technical manual. He spent his late teens in and out of trouble, emerging from a six month stay in jail as an accomplished and professional cracker. By 1988 (at the age of 25) Kevin broke into Digital Equipment's computer network which got him arrested again by the FBI. This timehe spent a year in jail. Kevin's probation officer tried to rehabilitate him by enrolling him in a 12-step program to rid him of his computer addiction. The program failed, and Kevin became a fugitive after he was caught eavesdropping a Pacific Bell security official's voice mail. His next mistake was to break into the computer of Internet security expert Tsutomu Shimomura. Shimomura tracked Mitnick across the country to to his apartment in Raliegh, North Carolina. Kevin is now again behind bars. Mitnick's last feat was his greatest because he stole Shimomura's utility programs which might conceivably be used to crack systems: these were most likely distributed on the Internet's Underground. (For Underground websites try <http://www.2600.com>, or <http://www.digicrime.com>, or <http://www.paranoia.com> ).

Mark "PhiberOptik" Abene:

Mark Abene started up his career as a cracker using only a $300 Radio Shack computer. A teenage dropout in Queens, New York he acquired a self-taught education on-line. Although he denies it, PhiberOptik is said to have hooked up with New York's Masters Of Destruction, a group of crackers who once vowed to cripple computer and internet security. His alleged involvement got him under FBI investigation. In the summer of 1992, PhiberOptik and four members of Masters Of Destruction were arrested for their little phone antics (which included looking up David Duke's unlisted phone number on-line). Abene pleaded guilty and was given the longest and strictest sentence of any cracker in the Master's Of Destruction: a year in federal prison. After incarceration he found employment as a computer technician for ECHO, an on-line New York salon (a system which, by the way, never crashes).

Donald Gene Burleson:

A disgruntled Texas employee upset over his termination held his employer's computer system hostage. He copied and then deleted 168,000 of the company's sales commission records. When the company used backup tapes to replace the missing files, he decided to enact another form of revenge by crashing the system. He demanded that he be hired as the company's new computer and computer security consultant. The employer risked losing his system to have Burleson arrested. Extortion and blackmail is very common among the crackers Landreth classifies as thieves (link to motivation). It was very easy to prove malice in this case: Burleson got fined $11,800 and sentenced to seven years probation.

The Milwaukee 414's:

A group of Milwaukee kids (whose phone number prefixes began with 414) started a cracking club and became cracking celebrities of the early 1980's. The FBI eventually arrested the kids for computer trespassing. The situation was complicated because they deleted files to cover their tracks, and one of the erased files happened to belong to a research group in the Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York. The 414's also cracked the computer system of the Los Alamos Research Center where nuclear weapons are developed and tested. The group leader's, Neal Patrick, got immunity for giving evidence while the other six members received sentences of probation. None of the 414's were sent to jail because they were all minors.

The Tristen Case: The German 20:

A cracking club of young West German kids thought it would be fun to break into American and NATO defense systems. Their fun turned to crime and treason when they began to sell their stolen files to the Soviet Union and other Warsaw Pact countries. Sentenced to time in federal prisons, all of the German 20 also got off with probation due to their young ages.

Bill Landreth:

Known as "the Cracker", Bill was a member of the Inner Circle, an exclusive cracking club of the early 1980's. He began cracking when he was fouteen and retired at the ripe old age of 18 when FBI agents busted him and the Inner Circle in 1983. By then they had broken into computer systems of banks, newspapers, schools, the phone company, and credit card bureaus. The Inner Circle was indicted for computer fraud after they were caught tapping into the GTE Telemail Computer Network in Vienna, Virginia. Landreth was convicted and received three years probation. He now has a job in computer security.

John "Captain Crunch" Draper:

Known as the father of all crackers, Draper was the first phone phreak (link to ryan's how page--phreaking) in the public eye. He used a toy whistle found in a box of Captain Crunch cereal to simulate long-distance administrative call tones and to receive free long distance phone calls. He was arrested repeatedly in the 1970's for phone tampering. Draper would later perfect his system with"blue boxes", electronic tone generators which could reproduce most tones that the US telephone netework used in its call-routing services.

Robert Tappan Morris:

In November of 1988, Robert Tappan Morris unleashed (however unintentionally) into the world a program which became known as the Internet Worm. Due to a programming error made by Morris, the worm managed to cripple the Internet for a period of several days. By 1990, Robert was convicted and fined $10,000 (the maximum amount under then-current law). The Internet Worm was the first case prosecuted under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986.The case is important because it estbalished precedent that would help to convict other crackers and virus programmers. Even though there was no malice intended, Morris' act prevented many authorized users from accessing their work on the Internet. The federal grand jury found him responsible for the damage to productivity and the economic costs of the breakdown caused by his runaway program and convicted him.

[Anatomy of Cracking] [How Crackers Crack] [Legal and Ethical Issues] [Responses to Cracking] [On the Lighter Side] [ Questions for Discussion ] [Bibliography]

Page Published March 31, 1996
Go: RTF/COM 309's Computer Security Website